General Han Solo is a Christian who is on Paltalk that adopts the evidential methodology and while speaking to him on Paltalk he claims that he doesn't agree with the presuppostional method. My question I have asked him is can he provide any other worldview that can account for the intelligibility of reality other than the Christian world view?
And his response was that only the Christian worldview can account for the intelligibly of reality. Which demonstrates that he must assume the Christian worldview in order to account for the laws of logic, the uniformity of nature and objective morality.
I explained to him in light of that claim he cant consistently maintain using the evidential methodology because he would have to assume the Christian worldview in order to evaluate evidence.
Also he is stuck between a rock and a hard place because if there is any other worldview that can provide the intelligibility for reality that would mean God isn't the source of intelligibility. Is General comfortable with something or someone other than God that provides the intelligibility for reality? And if God is the source of intelligibility then how is the presuppostionalist method problematic to him since that is the very position that the presuppostional conveys?
General Han solo reminds me of man who says it is necessary to use a ladder order to discover who God is. And after climbing to the very top and he discovers God, he throws the ladder away and proclaims we couldn't even make sense of the ladder unless we start with God.
In one breath General wants us to evaluate evidence apart from God, then in the very same breath claim God is the precondition for evidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment