"Paul Williams: Baptized by Anthony Rogers"

PW is once again decimated by Rogers.

Rogers has presented the best explanation of all the data and all the historical evidence collectively. PW (as per usual for him), presents half-truths, incomplete research, and hyper-fundie literalist claptrap.

Imagine the type of conspiracy theory you would have to believe in order to deny all the evidence presented here. You would not only have to come up with an explanation for why Euesbius quotes the formula in four respective works and show why his copies of the Scripture possess the formula, you would then have to dismiss every extant MSS (from all multiple Manuscript families) and every quotation from the Ecclesiastical Authors (of which many pre-date Eusebius).

PW honestly always provides the worst reasoning for his so-called apostasy. In fact you would think a so-called apostate could define the Christian view of the Trinity. PW define the trinity as "300% god" and "3 gods". PW is unable to articulate in any accurate sense what Christians actually believe, unsurprising since he derives this misrepresentation from the Quran itself.

Since PW has blocked me and Royalson recently (but having difficult blocking Radical haha), I would like to post some links here that undermine his latest claptrap.

Would Jesus Command the beheading of rebellious children?

http://www.answeringabraham.com/2014/01/more-fundamentalist-hyper-literalist.html

And here are the links exposing his incomplete, inept and inadequate perception of Apostle Paul:

Does Paul have a 'low view' of the Law?

http://christianthinktank.com/musly2.html#badmouth

Is Paul's view of the Law radically different from that of Peter, James, John, and the Writer to the Hebrews?

http://christianthinktank.com/musly2.html#abnormal

Did Jesus come to perpetuate the Mosaic Law?

http://christianthinktank.com/musly2.html#perpetu8

But didn't Jesus strongly affirm the Law in Matthew 5.17-19?

http://christianthinktank.com/musly2.html#matt5

And here are a few bonuses where PW (historically speaking) is DECIMATED on the Apostle Paul:

http://www.answeringabraham.com/2013/03/historicity-of-jesus-confirms-paul.html

http://answering-islam.org/authors/thompson/paul-historical.html

Not to mention here is 133 similarities between Paul and Jesus:

http://www.answering-islam.org/Wales/jesus_paul.htm

http://www.answering-islam.org/Wales/jesus_paul_more.htm

Hopefully one of these days PW will actually decide to write anything of substance. He has been refuted so badly, I'm starting to feel sorry for the poor man, I think he is to delirious to understand what has happened to him.