Answering Abraham: December 2014

Was the repentant thief saved without understanding Jesus is God, Messiah or Savior? [Q&A]

Greetings J.S.

In the very least it seems what you are doing is problematic. Why? To allude to the exception to the rule in the Scripture, rather than the standard rule itself laid out by Scripture explicitly (on how one must be saved e.g. Romans 10) seems irresponsible.

I advise you to build doctrine on a house made of brick not sand my friend.

However lets investigate further. You said:

"It is because of the Good Thief incident,he certainly NEVER ACCEPTED Jesus as God,or Messiah or personal SAVIOUR. He jsut asked FOR HELP."

I highlighted the contradiction in bald so you can read your comment again. If the thief on the cross asked Jesus for help then Jesus became the recipient of his cry for physical and spiritual salvation and restoration and only hope for the after life in a distressing situation. After all how could someone who is dying alongside the thief been able to help and restore him and grant him eternal paradise unless that person was more than he appeared to be? They were both being tortured and mutilated to death in the most severely embarrassing manner, how could Jesus possibly help him? He was nailed to a cross! Hence the thief asking for "help" is an outward sign of an inward spiritual realization, that Jesus could rescue and save him, especially his soul.

This shows us our thief here had undergone an inner spiritual epiphany that his colleague (to the other side of Jesus) had not. He realized Jesus alone was the unique savior who had the omnipotent ability to grant him paradise making him God, Messiah and Savior. Further more the Scripture teaches us that no one can receive this kind of epiphany without first having a spiritual transformation:

"But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God." - John 1:12-13

And:

""Jesus answered, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." - John 3:5-6

Finally lets look at the context for important pieces of key information you may have missed:

And Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do." And they cast lots to divide his garments. And the people stood by, watching, but the rulers scoffed at him, saying, "He saved others; let him save himself, if he is the Christ of God, his Chosen One!" The soldiers also mocked him, coming up and offering him sour wine and saying, "If you are the King of the Jews, save yourself!" There was also an inscription over him, "This is the King of the Jews." One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him, saying, "Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!" But the other rebuked him, saying, "Do you not fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation And we indeed justly, for we are receiving the due reward of our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong." And he said, "Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom." And he said to him, "Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise." [Luke 23:34-43]

If you read carefully the parts I have highlighted here you will see the Thief was well aware of the banter between the various individuals. The thief heard Jesus refer to God as his own personal Father, showing him Jesus was God's Son. He even heard Jesus instruct the Father to forgive his enemies, showing that Jesus had some type of divine authority. He heard the people confess that Jesus had saved others, and shown awareness that he was conceivably some kind of Christ (Messiah). He had seen the sign above Jesus and heard the Jews and Romans speak of Jesus as a possible King of Jews. He confessed Jesus was sinless and made no crime. He rebuked his fellow criminal, by instructing him to fear God when the sinful man had sought to beg Jesus for physical deliverance. And to finish it off he openly requests Jesus to remember him (showing us Jesus is the omnipotent Lord of the heaven and judgement) in his kingdom (note Jesus kingdom, not merely "God's"). In conclusion this thief understood Jesus to be the Lord of Judgement, King (with a divine kingdom) and Messiah!

And remember we know that we cannot simply believe and/or express theological truths with true sincerity and repentance without God touching our hearts:

"He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." And Jesus answered him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven." - Matthew 16:15-17

And:

"No one can say "Jesus is Lord" except by the Holy Spirit" - 1 Corinthians 12:3c

And:

"God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth" - 2 Timothy 2:25

Thank you for your question. I pray that God draw you to true redemption in his Holy Son through the power of his Holy Spirit. Amen.

Pakistani Taliban Justify Murder Of Over 100+ Children By Sunnah of Mohammed

"The Tehreek-e-Taliban, which carried out perhaps the bloodiest school massacre in modern history, has called the killing consistent with what Prophet Mohammed did with his enemies 1400 years ago.

"At the time of the Bannu Qurayza massacre, Prophet Mohammed ordered only those children be killed whose pubic hairs have appeared," Umar Khurasani, spokesperson for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, is quoted as saying by the American website, examiner.com. He said the Islamic terrorists only followed sunnat (actions of Prophet Mohammed) during wars.

Bannu Qurayza was a Jewish tribe that lived in present day Madina in Saudi Arabia. The report mentions Islamic texts that say nearly 800 men and boys and one woman of the tribe were beheaded. Khurasani is quoted as saying that those who consider the Peshawar massacre un-Islamic should refer to Sahih al-Bukhari. Muslims consider Bukhari's as one of the most authentic books on what Prophet Mohammed said and did in his lifetime." ( read more here )

Surprised? ;)

Calling Christians SHUT DOWN - Ijaz Ahmad EXPOSED

Hey Brothers & Sisters

Quick Update:

Muslim Apologist "Ijaz Ahmad" owner of CallingChristians.com, Ijaz Ahmad who has for over 2 years ran from debating me (even in light of an open public debate challenge which he refused to acknowledge) has now put his blog in private mode, and for good reason:

He has gone into hiding after I wrote this article exposing his perverse sexual behavior by taking various quotes and screen shots from his blog. Ijaz is no doubt re-modifying his blog in light of this embarrassment. Ijaz has a known history of removing and taking down posts when he is exposed. This snake has no shame. Join with me in prayer for the salvation of this lost soul.

Here is the confession from Ijaz the sexual pervert himself:

Update:

Ijaz Ahmad removes my post and my ability to comment on his CallingChristians Facebook page. He does NOT want people knowing about his real character:

Debate: The Christology of John vs. the Qur'an

Debate: Crucifixion or Crucifiction? The Arguments of Ahmed Deedat Examined in Debate

The Qur'an is the Son of Allah - Applying the Quranic Logic To Itself!

For Muslims the idea of God being a Father and having a Son is paganism. As one commentator on Paul Williams blog shows us:

The problem is that the Qur'an itself (using Qur'anic logic) is actually the Son of Allah, as brother Sam Shamoun points out:

"The Quran is the uncreated speech of Allah, and it has a mother:

God doth blot out or confirm what He pleaseth: with Him is the Mother of the Book (ommu alkitabi). S. 13:39 Y. Ali

verily, we have made it an Arabic Qur’an; haply ye will have some sense. And it is in the Mother of the Book (ommi alkitabi) with Us,- high and wise. S. 43:3-4 Palmer

The mother of the book which contains the Quran is with God, an important point for our discussion as we shall shortly see. In another place it is said that the Quran’s clear verses are actually “the mother of the book”:

He it is who has revealed to thee the Book, of which there are some verses that are decisive, they are the mother of the Book (ommu alkitabi); and others ambiguous; but as for those in whose hearts is perversity, they follow what is ambiguous, and do crave for sedition, craving for (their own) interpretation of it; but none know the interpretation of it except God. But those who are well grounded in knowledge say, ‘We believe in it; it is all from our Lord; but none will remember save those who possess minds. S. 3:7 Palmer

Hence, the Quran originates from the mother of the book and its clear verses are the mother of the book, which means that the Quran has at least two mothers!

Doctorestonekisser’s “prophet” further taught that the Quran worships and intercedes with Allah, and will even appear in human form as a pale man:

Khalid b. Ma‘dan said: RECITE THE RESCUER, which is A.L.M. The sending down,3 for I have heard that a man who had committed many sins used to recite it and nothing else. It spread its wings over him AND SAID, ‘MY LORD, forgive him, for he often used to RECITE ME;’ so the Lord Most High MADE IT AN INTERCESSOR for him and said, ‘Record for him a good deed and raise him a degree in place of every sin.’ Khalid said: IT WILL DISPUTE on behalf of the one who RECITES IT when he is in the grave SAYING, ‘O God, if I am a part of Thy Book, make me AN INTERCESSOR for him; but if I am not a part of Thy Book, blot me out of it.’ It will be like a bird putting its wing on him, IT WILL INTERCEDE for him and will protect him from the punishment in the grave. He said the same about ‘Blessed is He.’4 Khalid did not go to sleep at night till he had recited them. Ta’us said they were given sixty virtues more than any other sura in the Qur’an. Darimi transmitted.”

3. Qur’an, xxxii.

4. Qur’an, lxvii. (Mishkat Al-Masabih, English Translation With Explanatory Notes by Dr. James Robson [Sh. Muhammad Ashraf Publishers, Booksellers & Exporters, Lahore-Pakistan, Reprint 1990], Volume II, Book VIII. The Excellent Qualities of the Qur’an, Chapter I, p. 459; bold and capital emphasis ours)

It was narrated that Buraydah said: I heard the Prophet say: “The Qur’an will meet its companion on the Day of Resurrection when his grave is opened for him, IN THE FORM OF A PALE MAN. IT WILL SAY TO HIM, ‘Do you recognize me?’ He will say: ‘I do not recognize you.’ IT WILL SAY: ‘I am your companion the Qur’an, who kept you thirsty on hot days and kept you awake at night. Every merchant benefits from his business and today you will benefit from your good deeds.’ He will be given dominion in his right hand and eternity in his left, and there will be placed on his head a crown of dignity, and his parents will be clothed with priceless garments the like of which have never been seen in this world. They will say: ‘Why have we been clothed with this?’ It will be said: ‘Because your son used to recite Qur’an.’ Then it will be said to him: ‘Recite and ascend in the degrees of Paradise,’ and he will continue to ascend so long as he recites, either at a fast pace or a slow pace.” Narrated by Ahmad in al-Musnad (394) and Ibn Maajah in al-Sunan (3781); classed as hasan by al-Busayri in al-Zawaa’id and by al-Albaani in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah (2829).

Here is the English translation of Ibn Majah’s version of this report:

3781. It was narrated from Ibn Buraidah that his father told that the Messenger of Allah said: “The Qur’an will come on the Day of Resurrection, LIKE A PALE MAN, AND WILL SAY: ‘I am the one that kept you awake at night and made you thirsty during the day.’” (Hasan) (English Translation of Sunan Ibn Majah – Compiled by Imam Muhammad Bin Yazeed Ibn Majah Al-Qazwini, From Hadith No. 3657 to 4341, Ahadith edited and referenced by Hafiz Abu Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’i, translated by Nasiruddin al-Khattab (Canada), final review by Abu Khaliyl (USA), [Darussalam Publications and Distributors, First Edition: June 2007], Volume 5, Chapters on Etiquette, Chapter 52. The Rewards Associated With Qur’an, pp. 68-69; capital emphasis ours)

And this is what the renowned Muslim scholar and expositor Al-Suyuti said concerning this hadith in his commentary (2/1242):

“In the form of a pale man”.

Al-Suyuti said: This is the one whose color has changed. It is as if he comes in this form so as to resemble his companion in this world, or to draw attention to the fact that just as his color changed in this world because of staying up at night to read Qur’an, the Qur’an will appear in a similar form because of its striving on the Day of Resurrection until its companion attains the ultimate goal in the Hereafter.

Thus, this pagan’s religion teaches him that there are three eternal beings, Allah, the Quran, and the Quran’s mommy. This also means that Allah is the Quran’s daddy, seeing that the Quran is his word, which means that the Quran’s mommy is actually his wife!

Now if the logic of the Quran is true then this means that the mother of the book has a spouse with whom she has sex. After all, how can she be a mother, or have any children, if she has no husband, no spouse? We can even reword Sura 6:101 in the following manner:

Wonderful Originator of the heavens and the earth! How could She (this unknown mysterious woman) be the Quran’s mother if she has no consort…?

But since this mysterious woman does have offspring then she must have a husband, and here is where the real problem lies for the Muslims: Since the Quran is believed to be the word of Allah, which makes him the source of the Quran, then this means that Allah is its father and the husband of the Quran’s mother! And since Muslims believe that the Quran is the uncreated speech of Allah then this means that its mother is also uncreated.

The Quran cannot exist before its mother which means that if the Quran is eternal then so is its mother, also implying that Allah has always been married! After all, whose wife could the Quran’s mother be if Allah is the only other entity that existed before creation?

Again, note the logic behind this:

(4) If the Quran has a mother, then the Quran must be an offspring.(5) But if the Quran is an offspring, then it must have a mother and a father.(6) If it has a mother and a father, then they must have had sex to produce the offspring.(7) Suras 13:39, 43:3-4, and 3:7 say that the Quran indeed has a mother.(8) Therefore, its mother and father must have had sex.(9) Hence, the best candidate for the father and the mother of the Quran is Allah and an eternal mysterious mother with whom he had sex."

Interestingly Sam has confirmed what myself and one co-author of mine has spoken of. Allah actually has genitals. Allah is capable of sexual reproduction:

http://www.answeringabraham.com/2012/08/joes-joesph-exposes-allah.html

http://www.answeringabraham.com/2013/05/does-allah-have-penis-allah-is-capable.html

To see more evidence of the Qur'an being a personal being see these:

http://answering-islam.org/authors/shamoun/conscious_quran.html

http://islamqa.info/en/93151

http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=460&Itemid=36

http://www.alim.org/library/quran/AlQuran-tafsir/TIK/2/0

To see how we are using the Qur'anic argument against itself, see these:

http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/without_consort.html

http://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/filial_terms.htm

A Psychological Nightmare with Ijaz Ahmad

Part 1 Narcissism & Convoluted Deception

Christian blogs addressing Islam rarely interact with Ijaz Ahmad anymore, every now and then it is necessary to remind Ijaz why this is the case, although unfortunately he maybe incapable of comprehending this because of his mental problems.

(Re)introducing Ijaz Ahmad (in case you had forgotten his level of grandeur):

"We have brother Ijaz...Ahmad, Ahmad is a 20 YEAR OLD MUSLIM SPEAKER from the Caribbean island of Trinidad...Trinidad Tobago, he also holds THE UNIQUE DISTINCTION of being a Muslim Trinidadian, i.e. a Trinidadian by nationality, being from Trinidad. Ijaz.. is a debater and a speaker for the London based, Muslim debate initiative and academic Muslim think tank featuring scholars and professionals from all fields and sciences who engage in professional discourse with non-Muslims. He also runs and maintains several interfaith groups, websites and pages, most notably his own organisation: CallingChristians, which can be found at CallingChristians.com. He attended presentation college, a PRESTIGIOUS CATHOLIC academic institution that has BIRTHED HIS COUNTRIES TWO PRIME MINISTERS AND IT'S CURRENT PRESIDENT. He is KNOWN for his articles, debates, PEER COUNSELING and most recently his ENDEAVORS TO COUNCIL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIMS. As recently as last Wednesday he engaged in a now published debate with renowned Christian apologist and speaker PASTOR Samuel Green of Answering Islam and Answering Muslims titled: "An incarnate God: fact or fiction?". He's currently a student at university, a university student, he spends his time studying philosophy, theology and history." (Dialogue with Bob Siegel)

Have you ever heard of a debater being introduced with there "age"? Not likely. That is unique to Ijaz, he finds his 'youth' and 'inexperience' to be important to his victim complex and sexual fetishes. But over all it seems at-least in his own community Ijaz Ahmad's reputation proceeds him! However unfortunately in the above dialogue Ijaz was caught lying about his own abilities to boost his credibility to the ignorant audience members as Anthony Rogers points out:

"One of the more notable aspects of this discussion was Ijaz pretending to know Hebrew and claiming that he was working directly from NA27. I kid you not. He was actually claiming to be reading the Hebrew of Zechariah from a text-critical edition of the Greek NT. Even people who don't know Hebrew can recognize on sight the difference between Hebrew and Greek."

Before this exchange Ijaz had accused Bob Siegel (his debate opponent) of being an immature under cover Muslim, the easiest Christian to debate and defeat and impossible to lose against (click here for the full story).

It is surprising that Ijaz would expend energy and prepare such a long time and been so eager to debate such an incompetent opponent. However after having evaluated Ijaz's own performance against (conceivably) the worst Christian apologist (judging by his own assessment) we are now left wondering whether Ijaz himself is actually a Christian plant since he lost to the worst apologist ever, even one that it was impossible to lose against! Ijaz has now usurped Bob's supposed former status. Bob not only easily held his own but Allah made it appear to many of us, showing us Bob was the clear winner.

Mike the host who introduces Ijaz credentials, clearly doesn't know who Ijaz is, he even struggles to pronounce his name or understand his accent. This shows us the submitted credentials of Ijaz were given to Mike and Bob by Ijaz. However some of these credentials are as questionable as the other demonstrably false claims Ijaz made in the debate:

Where has Samuel Green ever claimed to be a Pastor? And what and where is his Church he pastors at?
Why is it a unique distinction to be a Muslim Trinidadian? Muslims constitute 6 percent of the population on Trinidad and Tobago, representing 65,318 individuals.
What evidence is there for the assertion that Ijaz is known for his peer counseling especially of domestic abuse victims?
What scholars from all fields and sciences at MDI are involved with professional discourse with non Muslims? I wasn't away there was 'one scholar' from any field let alone all of them and on top of that they are debating non-Muslims?
What is this anonymous: "Muslim Think Tank"? And it if filled with scholars from all fields and sciences who engage in lectures and discourse with non-Muslims why can it not be found on Google? "Muslim Think Tank" is very vague. Provide the website so we can evaluate the 'scholarly' credentials from 'all fields and sciences'.

But this is not the first time Ijaz has lied about certain facts:

Then after knowingly lying about Christian theology he tries to deliberately twist Sam Shamoun to vindicate his lies:

I have quoted Sam Shamoun in context here. How did Ahmad looks pass glaring title of the article? maybe, cognitive bias. But perhaps he didn't lie? After all we can't expect Muslims to understand Christian Theology perfectly, maybe they sometimes make mistakes.

Unfortunately Ijaz repeated the same lies two years after this event, he still asserts:

"According to Christian belief, Elohiym can either refer to the Father (God) or the Godhead (all three persons of the Trinity). If Christ is claiming to be the Elohiym of Exodus 3:14 then there exists a major problem." (more here)

Part 2 Obsession, Abuse and Cognitive Dissonance

Ijaz has insulted all Christians including the deceased Church Fathers, and Protestant Reformers (who are unable to respond) 20th century apologists and contemporary believers, which means he also degraded the Catholic staff, teachers and students at his own former college (presentation). Ijaz claims you would have to be a fool to believe in what Christians believe about God's nature because it makes no sense, it's unknowable. He claims he was: "offended" by Samuel Green's preaching he felt "spoken down to" in a debate about the very topic he was there to discuss.

On another occasion he asserted that Samuel Green insulted and even "abused" Muslims for calling them "Mohammedans", while publicly referring to Christians as "Pauline" throughout his own articles. He tried to publicly humiliate Samuel Green by making a blog post about this.

When Samuel Green pointed out that he had only referred to an early group of Muslims as Mohammedans and not all Muslims, Ijaz removed the Facebook page from public eye. However this is not the first time Ijaz when has felt humiliated enough to feel compelled into removing a post. He removed my posts from his open debate forum on Facebook. Anthony Rogers also reports the same:

"As for Ijaz's comment that Zechariah 12:10 is not a prophecy about the death of Christ, which has absolutely nothing to do with Ijaz's stunning defeat at the hands of Bob, the fact is that Ijaz was so thoroughly exposed on this issue that he had to take down an exchange that took place between us on Facebook. " (Ijaz Goes Bobbing for Apples and Ends Up Drowning in Three Inches of Water)

Ijaz has complains about White's company, yet he has allowed violent threats to be posted on his page. When he is caught he removes them and veins ignorance. Mr Ahmad has made unprovoked attacks calling C.L. Edwards as an "idiot" and "freak show" and Anthony Rogers as "brain dead" in a formal professional debate. One time after politely discussing an uploaded video to you YouTube, Ijaz suddenly became abusive and vulgar and told a Christian brother (and fellow guest author on this blog: Radical Moderate/Robert Wells) to: "take your rectum out of your head, old man". (source). Signifying that Mr Ahmad views himself as 'young' and Christian men as old 'predators'

Part 3 Fixation on Sex

Recently again Ijaz decided to post an article this time about Sam Shamoun. Ijaz in an attempt to sound intelligible opens it with: "I’ve had the unfortunate experience of having a “conversation” with Sam Shamoun". Actually Ijaz you've had dozens of conversations with Sam Shamoun, and you've pointed out time and time again you are the alleged victim of his abuse in many of these exchanges.

However here you are "again" engaging with Sam Shamoun who you view as psychologically abusive, a tormentor if you will. You are like an abused victim repeatedly returning to the perpetrator. But you should know better because you council domestically abused individuals. I suppose you are also a patient of such abuse, you also need counselling which is why you council others, but you have denied yourself such a useful service, I would seriously reconsider. Perhaps a Catholic from presentation college would be willing to pay for a highly qualified and professional therapist on your behalf.

Further down in the post we learn that Ijaz published this article to tell us about what Sam thinks about sex. Apparently Sam Shamoun quoting several hadith showing that Sauda, one of Mohammed's wives was fat, old and unattractive so that Mohammed never spent time with her. This in Ijaz's mind was supposed to mean that Sam Shamoun is obsessed with 'sex'. I don't know how anyone with a rationally sane mind could conclude such things, but this is the same person who thought that James White's 'associates' (who we are not) had bizarre sexual fetishes, as if that was suppose to be worth while blog material? Why would professional apologist post about the alleged sexual fantasies of others? Ijaz Ahmad even claimed to be the object of a rape threat perpetrated by Sam Shamoun and Radical Moderate, Ijaz is truly the product of a fixated perverse sexual fantasies which he projects on to his imagined tormentors like Samuel Green and others. Unfortunately he has even projected C.L Edwards who preach the Gospel and exposed Islam as a sexual predator:

Ijaz refers to himself as a 'young teenage boy' and CL Edwards a strange older man, despite Mr. Edward's intention to preach his faith. This is interesting because Ijaz has a fetish with his age being rather young, he brings this up at every debate and has many articles on his websites about Priests and Young Boys, part of his obsessive compulsive complex. There is no doubt that Ijaz's Father (whether a priest or his own biological Father) abused him emotionally, physically and sexually, and Ijaz actually needs very serious professional help. I advise Christians to avoid referring to Ijaz as a 'young man' as this reminds Ijaz of dark times that he has not yet been able to psychologically recover from.

Besides this, what Ijaz deliberately omits in his post is his accusation that Shamoun lives like a pig and needs to fast:

"I am praying for you Sam, I pray that you lose the weight you have been begging God to help you lose. Islam has a solution for that, it’s called fasting, but hey, if you choose to eat and live like a pig because of your faith; then I got a tip for ya, it isn’t the food, it’s your behaviour!"

Ijaz often makes posts on his blog about abuse and sex, of which he says: "Naturally, when a person uses certain terms repeatedly, it is because these ideas and thoughts are constantly on their minds. They are frequently fixated on these topics and acts, these desires." Ijaz then informs us that he spends his time searching for these types of words: "If one is to spend time examining the content of the messages that Sam Shamoun sends, he always uses these sexually charged comments with Muslims". Ijaz I have to say this awfully disturbing to see that you actually proactively look for such filth from your abusive tormentor Sam Shamoun, this is disturbing and unhealthy to say the least, I again recommend a therapist or psychologist. I'm sure your therapist would tell you the same I have. You are actually using your discussion about Sam Shamoun to express sexual thoughts and fetishes and desires. Your repeated usage of the term 'sex' (18 times) or 'sexual' (14 times) only in one single post is actually quite creepy and you need to stop expressing your sexual ideas about Sam Shamoun in public. Your candid confession that you find pillars, rocks and stones to be 'phallic' is sickening to say the least. I honestly recommend you take the time out from writing public posts because your obsession with sex and older men is becoming overwhelming for your readers, here is just a quite recollection on what you post about on your blog:

Punishing the Female Rape Victim in Islam
Christianity Promotes Fornication: Evangelical Youths Loving Sex
German Priest Admits 280 Counts of Sexual Abuse
200 Priests Accused of Sexual Abuse in California
Culture of Pornography
Sam Shamoun, Anthony Rogers & Radical Moderate Perverted Statements.
72 Virgins? Does Allah Give Sexual Bribes?
Australian Roman Catholic Church Admits to Major Child Sex Abuse
German Priests Carried Out Sexual Abuse for Years
Radical Moderate’s Homosexual Fantasies
Elder of 7th Day Adventist Church, Principal on 14 Sexual Assault Charges
Sam Shamoun’s Obsession with Muslims and Sex
29 Sexually Explicit, Profane and Dirty Stories and Verses in the Bible

Here is the kind of news Ijaz likes to report:

Ijaz finds this kind of article 'germane' and 'interesting' for an apologetics blog (no doubt because Ijaz has sex posted all over his blog and loves hearing about priests), and even refers to sexual frustration and an outlet (psychological projection).

But here is some of the most shocking of them all:

Ijaz not only reports such news he gives an x rated analysis of the report! But what is even worse is he wants David Wood and Sam Shamoun (who are old men according to Ijaz, while Ijaz is young and innocent victim) to comment on this filth, and wants to know what they think about male genitalia:

But this is not the first time in public Ijaz has revealed his fetish with the male genitalia. In a previous debate held with Anthony Rogers after Ijaz inaccurately describing what Christians have worshiped, he proceeds to explain the final item we worship:

23:59:"Lastly in their fervor and zealous craze, they've even worshiped the foreskin of a man, that is the holy prepuce"

He likes to talk about his sexual fetish on his website. In his post (callingchristians.com/an-introduction-to-christianity/), Ijaz says:

"Circumsized, ate and evidently went to W.C?

8) Luke 2:21 “And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called Jesus, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.”

Is anyone not familiar with the meaning of the word “circumcised”? Just in case, circumcision simply means:

“Male circumcision is the surgical removal of some or the entire foreskin (prepuce) from the penis.”

Seriously, I am even ashamed of myself by saying this. How could anyone attribute such a thing to the Almighty God? HE HAD THE DIRTY PART OF HIS GENITALS CUT? DIRTY AND THIS PART? Unfortunately, Christians do not realize the extent of blasphemy they are uttering by believing that God was a man, a fully human being."

For more on Ijaz Ahmad's psychological and sexually bizarre history please visit here.

Now as Christians we should honestly pray for Ijaz to find peace and alleviation from his dark sexual and tormented history. But Ijaz you need professional help, there is no denying it now. Your sexual fetishes and fears are becoming very public and you should stop posting until you get this issue dealt with.