Unsurprisingly an Islamist "victim" propagandist has already referred to this blog as a 'hate website'. But I'm rather glad he brought this up. Muslims are very ambiguous in their usage of the word 'hate site'. Do they apply the same rules to every religion? Here are my thoughts I left this to this Muslim victim.
"The usual inconsistency
Now lets discuss your final inconsistency. Is having hate immoral? I mean at least do the honor of reading your book Chapter 60:4-8 and you will see hate is mandated.
Misuse And Inconsistent Usage of the Word "Hate"
And what exactly qualifies as a “hate site” anyway? I mean come up with an arbitrary, random criteria, that ANY website arguing against Islam on religious and political grounds MUST be a hate website. This is the most corrupt, incoherent usage of language I’ve seen in a while.
Does that mean any website theologically arguing against Christianity and pointing out Christian related terrorism or politics is a hate website as well? That must mean mean Muslim-Responses.com is a hate website. Or does that only apply to the special religion of Islam?
Look ultimately Rash, just admit that you think Islam should have special privileges and that Islam is above scrutiny. Before you call anyone a “hater”, define what you mean by “hate”.
Recently a Saudi in Malaysia was arrested by Interpol for saying “there are some things I don’t like about you , I will not pray for you” re: Mohammed. Is that also hateful by your criterion?
You are the usual Islamist propagandist.crying persecution when you don’t even use the term “hate” correctly. You render the usage of the term “hate” meaningless and obsolete by your improper characterization of blogs engaged in religious and political argument. Imagine comparing the word ‘hate’ how you are using it, to what was really happening to the Jews in Germany, your usage is appalling and you should be ashamed. Not one supposed blog you are calling ‘islamophobe’ is advocating the death or hatred of Muslims or even the second rate status of Muslim citizens. All of the content is related to undermine theological tenants of Islam and fiercely assault post-modern political Islamist ideology.
So thanks for insulting every group that actually was ‘hated’ and slandering there name in history. Please don’t come back with any of your appalling usages and deceptions and insult every persecuted group in history again with your careless, slanderous rendering of a word that shouldn’t even be part of every day vernacular.
Oh and by the way. It wouldn’t be plausible to say: “By the way your a hater”. But then not point out all of the news I have reported is false. Or all the information I have provided about the Warfare in the Quran, Tafsir, Sunnah etc is all false.
Or maybe you don’t disagree with any of the posts I’ve made, maybe what disturbs you is alot of it is related to Islamic nations or Islamic terrorism, I am singling out Islam rather than being an ‘equal religion opportune hater’.
Well the truth is most of the Atheists websites do not single out Judaism or Islam, in fact nearly every Atheist website I go to is ranting on Christianity. Do they then those Christians scream “hate site!!!, hate site!!!!”. No they engage in debate, like any normal westerner would. Do then these Christians go round inventing ridiculous words for criticism of their faith? Like “christian hater, christianphobe, jesusphobic!” No they don’t.
I should really dedicate an a post to just how irrational it is to call blogs criticizing Islam as ‘islamophobic and ‘hate blogs’. Not only do you insult very real persecuted groups by being senseless jackasses and desensitizing very serious concept of hate, you have no grounds to be victims whatsoever, except your obvious religious entitlement that your religion should be the only religion above criticism."
Why Do People Let Muslim "Victims" Get Away With Nonsense Like This?
Not only do Muslims not invent special words for Christians being persecuted, like "SonofGodphobe!", "Bibliophobic". They seem to think it's fair and equitable that Islam and Muslims have a SPECIAL word for persecution, note Jews have one since they went through a real genocide. But Muslims feel they deserve one even though this supposed persecution in the West of Muslims is known to be close to non-existent. In fact hate crimes of Muslims in America is even beneath Jews.
So where do they get this special religious entitlement from? Why are they allowed a special word. And why do they not apply these rules fairly and consistently to all religious and political groups? And why do they think criticism of Islam in religion in politics is synonymous with HATE SPEECH? What on earth would give them these ideas? It's really beyond the scope of many of us in the West that "criticism of a singular ideology" is considered a hate speech or hate crime. Every other discipline, theology and ideology receives the same level of criticism without censorship and without controversy but Islam ought to be the exception, why?
Well here is my theory. My theory is they get it from Islam.
And my theory is this irrational "Muslim victim" who referred to this as a hate website, is in agreement with the rest of the Muslim world, who think Islam should be immune from Criticism:
So there you have it. Muslims have no rational basis to be calling any website compatible with western values of freedom of speech and criticism, but they will because many Muslims are not happy with secularism, they are happy with censorship and freedom from criticism.
Finally so what if I don't like Islam. So what if I think western values are superior to Islamic values? Does that constitute hate? Well according to Islam, Shirk is a detestable sin, and therefore Muslims hate Christianity and any religion containing Polytheism. An even unforgivable sin. Muslims always constantly harp on the superiority of Islam over the Secularism, Even Mr Andalusi will be giving a speech about this very soon. Does that make him a hater?
Ultimately I don't expect these victims to ever use common sense and reason. But for those of you reading this. Remember to raise all these points that they will never answer since if they did they wouldn't be calling people haters or Islamophobes.
Finally so what if I don't like Islam. So what if I think western values are superior to Islamic values? Does that constitute hate? Well according to Islam, Shirk is a detestable sin, and therefore Muslims hate Christianity and any religion containing Polytheism. An even unforgivable sin. Muslims always constantly harp on the superiority of Islam over the Secularism, Even Mr Andalusi will be giving a speech about this very soon. Does that make him a hater?
Ultimately I don't expect these victims to ever use common sense and reason. But for those of you reading this. Remember to raise all these points that they will never answer since if they did they wouldn't be calling people haters or Islamophobes.
No comments:
Post a Comment